方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 定性主导干预混合方法设计× | 定性优先混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| 提出者≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 别名 | qual-dominant intervention MMR, qualitatively driven intervention design, QUAL+quan intervention design, qualitative-priority intervention mixed methods | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Qualitative-dominant intervention mixed methods is a research design in which qualitative inquiry carries primary theoretical and interpretive weight while quantitative data provide supplementary evidence, both strands applied within an intervention or program context. The design is used when understanding the lived experience of participants, the mechanisms of an intervention, and the meaning-making around change are more central to the research purpose than measuring effect sizes alone. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|