ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

推送-重贴标签算法×Bellman-Ford 算法×Ford-Fulkerson 算法×
领域运筹学运筹学运筹学
方法族Machine learningMachine learningMachine learning
起源年份198819561956
提出者Andrew V. Goldberg and Robert E. TarjanRichard Bellman and Lester R. FordLester R. Ford and Delbert R. Fulkerson
类型algorithmalgorithmalgorithm
开创性文献Goldberg, A. V., & Tarjan, R. E. (1988). A new approach to the maximum flow problem. Journal of the ACM, 35(4), 921-940. DOI ↗Bellman, R. (1958). On a routing problem. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 16(1), 87-90. DOI ↗Ford, L. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (1956). Maximal flow through a network. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 8(3), 399-404. DOI ↗
别名preflow-push algorithm, Goldberg-Tarjan algorithmBellman-Ford method, Bellman algorithmFord-Fulkerson method, augmenting path method
相关334
摘要The Push-Relabel Algorithm, developed by Andrew V. Goldberg and Robert E. Tarjan in 1988, is a highly efficient method for computing maximum flow in networks. Unlike augmenting path methods, it maintains a preflow and uses local push and global relabeling operations to drive flow toward the sink, achieving superior worst-case complexity.The Bellman-Ford Algorithm, developed by Richard Bellman and Lester R. Ford in the 1950s, is a fundamental algorithm for computing shortest paths in weighted graphs that may contain negative edge weights. Unlike Dijkstra's algorithm, it correctly handles negative weights and can detect the presence of negative-weight cycles.The Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm, developed by Lester R. Ford and Delbert R. Fulkerson in 1956, is a foundational method for computing the maximum flow in a flow network. It finds the maximum amount of flow that can be sent from a source to a sink through a directed graph with capacity constraints on edges.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Push-Relabel Algorithm · Bellman-Ford Algorithm · Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare