ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

偏好选择指数×层次分析法×多属性边界近似区域比较×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份201019802015
提出者Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G.Saaty, T. L.Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G.
类型Preference variation index (weight-free statistical)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Border approximation area (distance from BAA)
开创性文献Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials & Design DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗
别名
相关888
摘要PSI (Preference Selection Index) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PSI · AHP · MABAC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare