ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于协议的元民族志×定性元综合×
领域科学计量学证据综合
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1988 (meta-ethnography); protocol-based practice formalised 2010s2007
提出者Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography); protocol registration formalised through PROSPERO and eMERGe guidanceSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
类型Qualitative evidence synthesis with pre-registered protocolFramework
开创性文献Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930742Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
别名pre-registered meta-ethnography, prospero meta-ethnography, registered qualitative synthesis, protocol-driven meta-ethnographyQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
相关52
摘要Protocol-based meta-ethnography is a structured qualitative evidence synthesis that follows Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnography method while requiring a pre-registered, publicly available protocol — typically on PROSPERO — before the review is conducted. Pre-registration constrains post-hoc decision-making, enhances methodological transparency, and aligns qualitative synthesis with the rigour standards now expected by leading journals and funders.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Protocol-based Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare