ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于方案的荟萃分析×系统性文献综述×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2015 (Cochrane established 1993; PROSPERO launched 2011; PRISMA-P 2015)1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
提出者Cochrane Collaboration; formalized through PROSPERO and PRISMA-P initiativesArchie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
类型Evidence synthesis with pre-registered protocolEvidence synthesis methodology
开创性文献Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4). Cochrane. link ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
别名pre-registered meta-analysis, prospective meta-analysis, registered meta-analysis, protocol-driven meta-analysisSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
相关45
摘要A protocol-based meta-analysis is a meta-analysis conducted according to a detailed, pre-registered protocol that specifies all key methodological decisions — research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, outcome measures, and statistical methods — before data collection begins. Pre-registration, typically through PROSPERO or a comparable registry, distinguishes this approach from post-hoc or exploratory meta-analyses and substantially reduces the risk of selective reporting and outcome switching.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Protocol-based Meta-analysis · Systematic Literature Review. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare