方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比例目的抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–2000s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Derived from purposive sampling tradition (Patton); formalized in mixed-methods literature | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Non-probability sampling with proportional allocation | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名≠ | proportional criterion sampling, quota-proportional purposive sampling, representational purposive sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Proportional purposive sampling combines the intentional case selection of purposive sampling with proportional allocation across subgroups. Researchers first determine how each meaningful subgroup (e.g., gender, school type, professional role) is represented in the population, then deliberately select participants from each subgroup in those same proportions — using purposive judgment to ensure each selected case is information-rich and relevant to the research question. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|