方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比例目的抽样× | 最大变异抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–2000s | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) |
| 提出者≠ | Derived from purposive sampling tradition (Patton); formalized in mixed-methods literature | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton |
| 类型≠ | Non-probability sampling with proportional allocation | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| 别名≠ | proportional criterion sampling, quota-proportional purposive sampling, representational purposive sampling | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Proportional purposive sampling combines the intentional case selection of purposive sampling with proportional allocation across subgroups. Researchers first determine how each meaningful subgroup (e.g., gender, school type, professional role) is represented in the population, then deliberately select participants from each subgroup in those same proportions — using purposive judgment to ensure each selected case is information-rich and relevant to the research question. | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|