方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 比例便利抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Mid-20th century onward | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Developed within mainstream sampling methodology; no single originator | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Non-probability sampling with proportional allocation constraint | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. link ↗ | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名 | quota-constrained convenience sampling, representative convenience sampling, proportionate accidental sampling, PCS | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Proportional convenience sampling is a non-probability technique that recruits participants through convenience while constraining each subgroup's share in the final sample to match its known proportion in the target population. It trades pure random selection for feasibility, but partially compensates by ensuring the sample's compositional profile mirrors the population on one or more key variables such as gender, age group, or academic year. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|