ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)2000
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Causal inference / reweightingCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weightingIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关65
摘要Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Weighting · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare