ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)×双重稳健估计(AIPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)2005
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
类型Causal inference / reweightingSemiparametric causal estimator
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
别名PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weightingAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
相关65
摘要Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Weighting · Doubly Robust Estimation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare