ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)×粗化精确匹配 (CEM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)2011-2012
提出者Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)Iacus, King, & Porro
类型Causal inference / reweightingMatching / causal inference
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
别名PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weightingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
相关66
摘要Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Propensity Score Weighting · Coarsened Exact Matching. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare