ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

提示工程×LoRA 和 PEFT×
领域文本挖掘深度学习
方法族Process / pipelineMachine learning
起源年份2020 (few-shot prompting); 2022 (chain-of-thought)2022
提出者Tom Brown et al. (GPT-3 / few-shot framing, 2020); chain-of-thought extended by Jason Wei et al. (2022)Hu, E. J. et al.; Lester, B. et al.
类型NLP pipeline — structured instruction design for large language modelsParameter-efficient fine-tuning of large pretrained models
开创性文献Brown, T. et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 33, 1877-1901. link ↗Hu, E. J. et al. (2022). LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models. ICLR. link ↗
别名instruction design, LLM prompting, Yönerge Mühendisliği (Prompt Engineering)LoRA ve PEFT — Parametre Verimli İnce Ayar, Low-Rank Adaptation, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prefix tuning
相关75
摘要Prompt engineering is the practice of crafting structured natural-language instructions — prompts — to elicit targeted outputs from large language models (LLMs). Formalised by Brown et al. (2020) in the context of GPT-3 and extended by Wei et al. (2022) with chain-of-thought prompting, it encompasses four main strategies: zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and tree-of-thought. Rather than re-training a model, the analyst shapes the model's behaviour entirely through the design of the input text.LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation), introduced by Hu et al. in 2022, and the broader family of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods adapt large pretrained language models to new tasks by training only a small number of extra parameters instead of every weight in the model. This makes fine-tuning possible with far less GPU memory and compute while leaving the original model largely untouched.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Prompt Engineering · LoRA and PEFT. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare