方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 糖尿病问题区域量表 (PAID)× | 糖尿病自我效能感量表 (DASES)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心脏病学 | 心脏病学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1995 | 2009 |
| 提出者≠ | William H. Polonsky | Kate Lorig |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Welch, G. W., Weinger, K., Anderson, B., & Polonsky, W. H. (1997). Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabetes Care, 20(5), 696–702. link ↗ | Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P. L., Villa, F. J., & Armas, J. (2009). Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: A randomized trial. Diabetes Educator, 35(4), 641–651. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | PAID | DASES |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) is a 20-item self-report measure that assesses emotional and behavioral problems related to diabetes self-management, including worries about complications, regimen burden, social and family challenges, and emotional distress. Originally developed by Polonsky and colleagues in 1995, the PAID has been extensively validated and remains one of the most widely used diabetes-specific emotional assessment tools in research and clinical practice, particularly for identifying psychosocial barriers to optimal diabetes control. | The Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DASES) is an 8-item self-report measure that assesses a patient's confidence in their ability to manage key diabetes self-care tasks: medication adherence, glucose monitoring, diet management, exercise, and coping with symptoms or complications. Developed by Lorig and colleagues based on social-cognitive theory, the DASES is grounded in Bandura's self-efficacy framework and demonstrates strong predictive validity for glycemic control, treatment adherence, and quality of life outcomes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|