方法对比

	PRISMA合规的共被引分析	基于PRISMA的综述
领域	科学计量学	科学计量学
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s)	2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020
提出者	PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973)	David Moher and PRISMA Group
类型	Systematic bibliometric review	Structured reporting framework for systematic reviews
开创性文献	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
别名	systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis	PRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review
相关	6	5
摘要	PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram.	A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process.