方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| PRISMA合规的共被引分析× | 文献耦合分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 文献计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s) | 1963 |
| 提出者≠ | PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973) | Melvin M. Kessler |
| 类型≠ | Systematic bibliometric review | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis | document coupling, bibliographic similarity |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram. | Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|