ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

PRISMA清单:系统评价和荟萃分析报告标准×Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0用于随机对照试验×
领域研究方法论研究方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2021 (original 2009)2019
提出者Page et al. (PRISMA Group)Jonathan Sterne, Julian Higgins (Cochrane Collaboration)
类型Systematic review author reporting checklistClinician-rated / Research team assessment
开创性文献Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. DOI ↗
别名PRISMA, PRISMA 2020RoB 2.0, RoB 2
相关44
摘要PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.RoB 2 is the Cochrane Collaboration's updated methodology for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Published in 2019, it replaced the original Cochrane RoB tool with a more structured, transparent approach using signalling questions and domain-based judgments to evaluate five critical sources of bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PRISMA Checklist · Cochrane RoB 2.0. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare