ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

实用所罗门四组设计×所罗门四组设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1949 (Solomon design); pragmatic variant in applied use from 1990s onward1949
提出者Solomon four-group design: Richard L. Solomon (1949); pragmatic orientation formalized by Schwartz & Lellouch (1967) and Thorpe et al. (2009)Richard L. Solomon
类型Experimental design (pragmatic variant)True experimental design
开创性文献Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗
别名pragmatic S4GD, real-world Solomon four-group design, pragmatic pretest-control design, pragmatic Solomon designSolomon design, four-group design, Solomon four-group control design, S4GD
相关55
摘要The Pragmatic Solomon Four-Group Design combines the pretest-sensitization control logic of the classic Solomon (1949) four-group structure with the broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and real-world conditions characteristic of pragmatic trials. Four groups are formed: two receive the intervention (one pretested, one not) and two serve as controls (one pretested, one not), allowing simultaneous estimation of treatment effects and pretest sensitization effects under ecologically valid settings.The Solomon Four-Group Design extends the classic pretest-posttest control-group design by adding two groups that receive no pretest, enabling researchers to detect whether the pretest itself alters participants' responses to the treatment. Introduced by Richard L. Solomon in 1949, it remains the gold standard for isolating the independent effect of a pretest and for obtaining unbiased estimates of treatment efficacy.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pragmatic Solomon Four-Group Design · Solomon Four-Group Design. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare