ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

实用型单案例实验设计×单被试实验设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1960s–1970s (SSED roots); pragmatic framing prominent from 1990s onward1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
提出者Applied behavior analysis tradition (Sidman, Baer, Wolf, Risley); pragmatic adaptation from clinical researchMurray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
类型Single-case experimental design variantExperimental research design
开创性文献Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195341881Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
别名pragmatic SSED, pragmatic N-of-1 design, real-world single-case design, applied single-subject experimental designSSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
相关66
摘要Pragmatic single-subject experimental design applies the logic of single-case experimentation — repeated measurement, baseline comparison, and phase manipulation — within real-world practice settings rather than controlled laboratories. It allows practitioners and clinicians to rigorously evaluate interventions for individual participants without requiring large samples, making it especially valuable in applied, clinical, and educational contexts where heterogeneity across individuals is high.Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pragmatic Single-Subject Experimental Design · Single-Subject Experimental Design. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare