ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Pragmatic Screening Test Evaluation×队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s-2010s (formalized with PRECIS framework)Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s)
提出者Pragmatic trial framework: Schwartz & Lellouch (1967); PRECIS tool: Thorpe et al. (2009)Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854)
类型Observational / quasi-experimental evaluation designObservational longitudinal study design
开创性文献Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., & Chalkidou, K. (2009). A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(5), 464-475. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名pragmatic diagnostic screen evaluation, real-world screening evaluation, effectiveness-oriented screening study, PRECIS-guided screening evaluationlongitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study
相关56
摘要A pragmatic screening test evaluation assesses the real-world effectiveness of a screening instrument under routine clinical or public-health conditions — rather than the tightly controlled, ideal-participant settings of explanatory studies. It asks whether the screening tool performs adequately in the actual populations and workflows where it will be deployed, prioritising external validity and implementation relevance over maximally controlled internal conditions.A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pragmatic Screening Test Evaluation · Cohort Study. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare