ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

实用性随机临床试验×多中心随机临床试验×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19671970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials)
提出者Daniel Schwartz & Joseph LellouchEvolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980s
类型Interventional study designInterventional experimental design
开创性文献Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385
别名pragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trialmulti-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trial
相关66
摘要A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial · Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare