ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Pragmatic Field Experiment×簇随机现场试验×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967 (pragmatic framing); 2009 (PRECIS tool)1980s–1990s (formalized methodology)
提出者Schwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic framing); formalized for practice through PRECIS framework (Thorpe et al.)David M. Murray (group-randomized trials framework); applied broadly in public health and education research
类型Experimental designRandomized experimental design
开创性文献Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120424
别名pragmatic effectiveness trial, real-world field experiment, effectiveness field trial, practical field studyCRFE, cluster-randomized trial in the field, group-randomized field experiment, community-randomized field experiment
相关64
摘要A pragmatic field experiment tests whether an intervention works under real-world, routine conditions rather than under the tightly controlled settings of a laboratory or explanatory trial. It combines the pragmatic trial philosophy — prioritising external validity and decision-relevance — with field experimentation, so findings directly inform policy and practice. The design is positioned toward the pragmatic end of the PRECIS continuum and is widely used in public health, education, agriculture, and behavioral economics.A cluster randomized field experiment (CRFE) assigns intact groups — schools, villages, clinics, workplaces — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions, and the experiment is conducted in real-world settings rather than a laboratory. Randomization at the group level controls for contamination between conditions while preserving the ecological validity of the natural environment. It is the dominant design for evaluating community-level, school-based, or workplace interventions in public health, education policy, and development economics.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pragmatic Field Experiment · Cluster Randomized Field Experiment. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare