ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

实用析因实验×随机对照试验 (RCT)×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineHypothesis test
起源年份2000s–2010s (formal integration)1948
提出者Synthesized from pragmatic trial methodology (Schwartz & Lellouch, 1967) and factorial design principles (Fisher, 1935); formalized in clinical research contexts in the 2000s–2010sJames Lind (early precursor, 1747); modern formulation: Austin Bradford Hill & Medical Research Council (1948)
类型Experimental trial designInterventional comparative study
开创性文献Loudon, K., Treweek, S., Sullivan, F., Donnan, P., Thorpe, K. E., & Zwarenstein, M. (2015). The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ, 350, h2147. DOI ↗Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. BMJ, 340, c332. DOI ↗
别名pragmatic factorial trial, pragmatic factorial RCT, real-world factorial design, PFERCT, randomised controlled trial, clinical trial, Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma (RCT) Tasarımı
相关37
摘要A pragmatic factorial experiment combines two powerful methodological frameworks: the factorial experimental design — which tests multiple intervention components simultaneously — and the pragmatic trial orientation, which prioritizes real-world applicability, broad eligibility criteria, and flexible delivery conditions. The result is a design that efficiently evaluates which components of a complex intervention work, and whether they interact, while maintaining ecological validity for health, behavioral, and educational research.A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard experimental design in clinical and health research, in which participants are randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group so that the effect of an intervention can be measured with the highest possible degree of internal validity. The modern parallel-group RCT was formalized by Austin Bradford Hill and the Medical Research Council in their landmark streptomycin trial of 1948, and its reporting is governed today by the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (Schulz et al., 2010).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pragmatic Factorial Experiment · Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare