方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 实用病例系列研究× | 队列研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 流行病学 | 流行病学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Pragmatic framing formalized 1967; case series practice predates 20th century | Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s) |
| 提出者≠ | Pragmatic framework: Schwartz & Lellouch (1967); case series design: longstanding clinical tradition | Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854) |
| 类型≠ | Observational descriptive study | Observational longitudinal study design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 |
| 别名≠ | real-world case series, pragmatic observational case series, practice-based case series | longitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A pragmatic case series is an observational study that documents consecutive or purposively selected patients receiving a clinical intervention or presenting with a condition under routine, real-world practice conditions — without randomization, a control group, or the highly controlled eligibility criteria characteristic of explanatory trials. It is used to describe treatment patterns, outcomes, and adverse events as they occur in everyday clinical settings. | A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|