ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多类别信度分析×ordinal reliability analysis×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份2007–2009 (formal ordinal extensions); broader framework since 1950s2007
提出者Building on Cronbach (1951) and McDonald (1978); ordinal extensions by Zumbo and colleagues (2007) and Green and Yang (2009)Bruno D. Zumbo and colleagues
类型Reliability estimationInternal consistency reliability estimation
开创性文献Green, S. B. & Yang, Y. (2009). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 155–167. DOI ↗Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M. & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta as measures of internal consistency for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21–29. DOI ↗
别名polytomous scale reliability, ordinal reliability estimation, reliability for ordered-category items, polychoric reliability analysisordinal alpha, polychoric reliability, reliability for ordinal scales, ORA
相关35
摘要Polytomous reliability analysis estimates the internal consistency or precision of measurement for scales composed of items with more than two ordered response categories, such as Likert-type, rating, or partial-credit items. It corrects a well-known underestimation bias in conventional Cronbach's alpha by working with polychoric correlations or IRT-based precision indices.Ordinal reliability analysis estimates the internal consistency of scales whose items are measured on ordered-category (Likert-type) response formats. By basing computations on polychoric correlations rather than Pearson correlations, it corrects for the attenuation that standard Cronbach's alpha produces when responses are discrete and non-normal.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Polytomous Reliability Analysis · Ordinal Reliability Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare