ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Policy Network Analysis×Advocacy Coalition Framework×
领域Public PolicyPublic Policy
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19921993
提出者R. A. W. Rhodes & David Marsh (British school); broader governance-network traditionPaul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith
类型Analysis of inter-organisational policy relationshipsTheory of the policy process
开创性文献Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN: 9780198278528Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499
别名Policy Networks, Governance Network Analysis, Policy Network ApproachACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach
相关44
摘要Policy network analysis examines policymaking as the product of relationships among interdependent actors — government agencies, interest groups, experts and others — who exchange resources such as information, money, legitimacy and authority. In the influential British tradition associated with R. A. W. Rhodes and David Marsh, policy networks range along a continuum from tightly knit, exclusive 'policy communities' to loose, open 'issue networks', and the type of network is held to shape policy outcomes. More broadly, the approach applies the concepts and tools of social-network analysis to governance, treating the structure of ties among actors as a key explanatory variable.The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Policy Network Analysis · Advocacy Coalition Framework. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare