ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

政策评估事件研究设计×面板数据固定效应模型×
领域因果推断计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1993-20212014
提出者Andrews (1993), MacKinlay (1997); formalized for policy evaluation by Freyaldenhoven, Hansen & Shapiro (2019) and Callaway & Sant'Anna (2021)Hsiao (textbook treatment); within transformation of panel data
类型Quasi-experimental / causal inferencePanel data regression
开创性文献Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗
别名event study, event-study DiD, dynamic DiD, PEESDfixed effects model, within estimator, panel fixed-effects regression, Panel Veri — Sabit Etkiler Modeli
相关55
摘要A policy evaluation event study design is a quasi-experimental approach that estimates causal effects of a policy by plotting treatment-period-by-period coefficients around a common event time. It extends difference-in-differences to visualize both pre-treatment parallel trends and the dynamic post-treatment evolution of the policy effect, and has become the standard credibility check in applied policy research.The Panel Data Fixed Effects model estimates relationships from panel data (the same units observed over several time periods) while controlling for unit- and/or time-specific effects, supporting causal inference. It is developed as the within estimator in standard treatments such as Hsiao's Analysis of Panel Data (2014).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Policy Evaluation Event Study Design · Panel Fixed Effects. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare