ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

策略评估双重稳健估计×逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1994-20052000
提出者Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994); Bang & Robins (2005)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
类型Semiparametric causal estimatorCausal inference weighting estimator
开创性文献Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics, 61(4), 962-973. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
别名DR estimation for policy, augmented IPW for policy evaluation, AIPW policy evaluation, doubly robust policy analysisIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
相关55
摘要Policy Evaluation Doubly Robust Estimation applies the doubly robust (DR) estimator to assess the causal effect of a public policy or programme. It combines a model of treatment assignment (propensity score) with a model of the outcome, and requires only one of the two models to be correctly specified to produce a consistent estimate of the average treatment effect, making it a resilient tool for programme evaluation.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Policy Evaluation Doubly Robust Estimation · Inverse Probability Weighting. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare