方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 策略评估双重稳健估计× | 逆概率治疗加权法 (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994-2005 | 2000 |
| 提出者≠ | Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994); Bang & Robins (2005) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| 类型≠ | Semiparametric causal estimator | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics, 61(4), 962-973. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | DR estimation for policy, augmented IPW for policy evaluation, AIPW policy evaluation, doubly robust policy analysis | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Policy Evaluation Doubly Robust Estimation applies the doubly robust (DR) estimator to assess the causal effect of a public policy or programme. It combines a model of treatment assignment (propensity score) with a model of the outcome, and requires only one of the two models to be correctly specified to produce a consistent estimate of the average treatment effect, making it a resilient tool for programme evaluation. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|