ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

因果推断中的安慰剂检验×回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20102008
提出者Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (synthetic control placebos); Imbens & Lemieux (RDD validity)Imbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
类型Falsification / robustness test family for causal inferenceQuasi-experimental causal design
开创性文献Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
别名falsification tests, placebo checks, refutation tests, Plasebo Testleri — Nedensel Çıkarım DoğrulamaRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
相关55
摘要Placebo tests are a family of falsification checks that probe the credibility of a causal claim by re-running the analysis on a fake treatment, a false intervention date, or an outcome that should not have been affected. The approach was popularised through the synthetic control work of Abadie, Diamond and Hainmueller (2010) and the regression-discontinuity validity checks of Imbens and Lemieux (2008).Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Placebo Tests · Regression Discontinuity. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare