ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

带BWM权重和粗糙数不确定性的Plithogenic MABAC×最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20152015
提出者Pamučar, D. Ćirović, G.Rezaei, J.
类型Plithogenic-rough border approximation area (PL+RN+MABAC)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
开创性文献Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using MABAC. Expert Systems with Applications link ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
别名
相关38
摘要PL-MABAC (Plithogenic MABAC (with BWM weighting and Rough Number uncertainty)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D. Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PL-MABAC · BWM. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare