ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

概率语言扩展EDAS×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20161995
提出者Pang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Probabilistic Linguistic outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set (PLTS: {L_k|p_k})Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Pang, Q., Wang, H., Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要PL-EDAS (Probabilistic Linguistic extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, Z. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PL-EDAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare