方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 预实验日志× | 现场记录× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 19th–20th century (lab notebooks); pilot-testing conventions codified mid-20th century | Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century) |
| 提出者≠ | Scientific research community (laboratory practice); pilot-testing formalized by survey and experimental methodologists | Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al. |
| 类型≠ | Instrument-validation + structured data collection | Qualitative data collection and recording technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. DOI ↗ | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813 |
| 别名 | pilot-tested lab journal, pilot-tested research logbook, validated experiment diary, pre-tested lab log | fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottings |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A pilot-tested experiment log is a structured research instrument — a systematic journal of experimental procedures, observations, and results — that has been trialed with a small representative sample before full deployment. The pilot phase identifies ambiguous recording fields, impractical time demands, or inconsistent terminology, enabling targeted revisions that improve the log's reliability and completeness before the main data-collection phase begins. | Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|