ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

现场试验×簇随机试验×
领域实验设计临床研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Mid-20th century (systematised 1960s–1990s)1999-2000
提出者Rooted in Campbell & Stanley (1966) experimental design tradition; formalised in clinical and social research through the 20th centuryCampbell, Grimshaw, Elbourne et al.
类型Experimental designResearch Design
开创性文献Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally. ISBN: 978-0395307878Campbell, M. K., Grimshaw, J. M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 30. link ↗
别名pilot field trial, small-scale field experiment, feasibility field experiment, exploratory field experimentCRT, cluster RCT, cluster trial, group randomization
相关33
摘要A pilot field experiment is a small-scale, preliminary version of a planned full field experiment conducted in a naturalistic setting. It tests whether the intervention, randomisation procedure, measurement instruments, and logistical protocols are feasible before committing to a full-scale study. Results inform sample size calculations, refine treatment protocols, and identify procedural risks — saving resources and improving the quality of the definitive study.A cluster randomized trial (CRT) randomizes intact groups—schools, clinics, villages, or hospital wards—rather than individuals. Developed by Campbell, Grimshaw, and colleagues in the late 1990s to address real-world settings where intervention delivery or contamination occurs at the group level, CRTs are now standard for evaluating population-level, community-based, and policy interventions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Pilot Field Experiment · Cluster Randomized Trial. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare