ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

概率犹豫集延拓TOPSIS方法×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份1995
提出者PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCHDiakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Probabilistic Hesitant outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH (). PENDING — PHF-TOPSIS specific seminal not confirmed. Zhang et al. 2017 (doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001) is the foundational PHFS paper, not a PHF-TOPSIS paper. L.formulation.en cites 'Zhu & Xu 2018' as PHF-TOPSIS anchor — unverified. Candidate from search: Naeem et al. 2021 'Extended TOPSIS method based on the entropy measure and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information' (JIFS, doi:10.3233/JIFS-202700) — not confirmed as the canonical seminal.. link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要PHF-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PHF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare