ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

概率犹豫集延拓TOPSIS方法×最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份2015
提出者PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCHRezaei, J.
类型Probabilistic Hesitant outranking/ranking — Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Element (PHFE: {γ|p} pairs)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
开创性文献PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH (). PENDING — PHF-TOPSIS specific seminal not confirmed. Zhang et al. 2017 (doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001) is the foundational PHFS paper, not a PHF-TOPSIS paper. L.formulation.en cites 'Zhu & Xu 2018' as PHF-TOPSIS anchor — unverified. Candidate from search: Naeem et al. 2021 'Extended TOPSIS method based on the entropy measure and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information' (JIFS, doi:10.3233/JIFS-202700) — not confirmed as the canonical seminal.. link ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要PHF-TOPSIS (Probabilistic Hesitant extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by PENDING_LITERATURE_SEARCH. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: PHF-TOPSIS · BWM. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare