方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 患者报告沟通量表× | CollaboRATE 共同决策量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 以患者为中心的护理 | 以患者为中心的护理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2009 | 2013 |
| 提出者≠ | Marianne Haskard Zolnierek, Roxane Dimateo | Glyn Elwyn |
| 类型 | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| 开创性文献≠ | Haskard Zolnierek, K. B., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826-834. DOI ↗ | Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | PRCS Clinician Communication, Communication Quality Scale | Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Patient-Reported Communication Scale (PRCS) is a brief, validated instrument that measures patients' perceptions of clinician communication quality in healthcare encounters. Developed through meta-analytic research by Haskard Zolnierek and DiMatteo, the PRCS assesses key dimensions of effective patient-clinician communication: clarity of explanations, listening, showing respect and empathy, and addressing patient concerns. The scale is used to evaluate clinician communication competence, identify training needs, and correlate communication quality with patient adherence, satisfaction, and health outcomes. | CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|