方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Patent Analysis× | Constructive Technology Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1994 | 1995 |
| 提出者≠ | Francis Narin (patent bibliometrics) and the patent-analytics community | Arie Rip & Johan Schot (Dutch CTA tradition) |
| 类型≠ | Document-based technological-intelligence process | Co-evolutionary technology-shaping process |
| 开创性文献≠ | Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155. DOI ↗ | Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Patent analytics, Patent bibliometrics, Patent landscaping | CTA, Constructive TA, Co-evolutionary technology assessment |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Patent analysis, or patanalytics, mines the documents and metadata in patent databases to generate technological intelligence. Because patents are structured, dated, classified, and citation-linked records of inventive activity, analysing patent counts, citations, classification codes, applicants, and text reveals who is innovating where, in which technologies, how fields connect, and how the technological landscape is shifting—evidence that feeds competitive intelligence, R&D strategy, and foresight. | Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) is an approach to assessing technology that seeks to influence its design and development, not merely to forecast its impacts after the fact. By broadening the design process to feed societal aspects back to engineers and decision-makers early—while the technology is still malleable—CTA aims to manage the co-evolution of technology and society and to soften the Collingridge dilemma, the bind in which a technology's effects are easy to change before they are known and hard to change once they are. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|