方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 参与性定量优先混合设计× | 并行三角混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| 提出者≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark (core typology); Mertens (participatory-transformative lens) | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 类型 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483358468 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| 别名 | QUAN-priority participatory mixed methods, community-based quantitative-priority mixed design, participatory QUAN-dominant mixed methods, PAR quantitative-priority mixed design | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Participatory quantitative-priority mixed design combines a community-engaged, participatory research framework with a mixed methods structure in which the quantitative strand carries primary weight. Stakeholders and community members co-shape research questions, instruments, and interpretation, while quantitative data provide the dominant evidence base and qualitative data serve a complementary, explanatory, or contextualizing role. This design is particularly suited to applied, evaluative, and social-justice-oriented inquiry where both statistical rigor and community voice are required. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|