方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 参与式多案例研究× | 比较多案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s (convergence of case study methodology and participatory research traditions) | 1984 (Yin); 2006 (Stake multiple-case analysis) |
| 提出者≠ | Robert K. Yin (multiple case study logic); Kurt Lewin and subsequent PAR scholars (participatory framework) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| 开创性文献 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | participatory multi-case study, collaborative multiple case study, PMCS, participatory comparative case research | multi-site case study, cross-case analysis, comparative case research, multi-case comparative design |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Participatory multiple case study research integrates the structured logic of multiple case study design — examining two or more bounded cases to build analytic generalisations — with the collaborative ethics of participatory research, where community members or practitioners co-design the inquiry, co-collect data, and co-interpret findings. The approach combines Yin's replication logic across cases with the emancipatory and co-ownership principles that define participatory action research traditions. | Comparative multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify patterns, contrasts, and transferable findings. Rooted in Robert Yin's case study methodology and Robert Stake's multiple-case analysis framework, it combines the rich contextual insight of single-case work with the analytical leverage gained by examining how phenomena unfold similarly or differently across distinct settings. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|