ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

参与式文献分析×参与式内容分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1940s–2000s (synthesis of participatory tradition and systematic document analysis)1990s–2000s (formalized in community-based and health research contexts)
提出者Rooted in participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s); document analysis formalized by Glenn Bowen (2009)Developed at the intersection of participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s) and qualitative content analysis traditions
类型Qualitative research designQualitative research method
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199811755
别名PDA, collaborative document analysis, participatory archival analysis, community-based document analysisPCA, community-based content analysis, collaborative content analysis, participatory textual analysis
相关45
摘要Participatory Document Analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically examines existing documents — such as policy records, reports, correspondence, and community archives — while actively involving community members or stakeholders as co-researchers in the selection, interpretation, and meaning-making processes. It merges the rigor of established document analysis techniques with the democratic ethos of participatory action research, ensuring that those most affected by the documents have voice in shaping what those documents mean.Participatory Content Analysis (PCA) is a qualitative method that integrates community members or stakeholders directly into the content analysis process. Rather than treating participants solely as data sources, PCA positions them as co-analysts who help develop coding categories, interpret textual data, and validate findings. This approach is widely used in health communication, education research, and community-based studies where insider knowledge and cultural context are essential to accurate interpretation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Participatory Document analysis · Participatory Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare