ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

参与式文献分析×批判性文献分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1940s–2000s (synthesis of participatory tradition and systematic document analysis)Late 20th – early 21st century (2000s–present as an explicit variant)
提出者Rooted in participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s); document analysis formalized by Glenn Bowen (2009)Glenn Bowen; Lindsay Prior (foundational document analysis); critical theory tradition (Freire, Habermas)
类型Qualitative research designQualitative research design and analytic method
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗
别名PDA, collaborative document analysis, participatory archival analysis, community-based document analysisCDA-doc, critical documentary analysis, critical policy document analysis, critical textual document analysis
相关45
摘要Participatory Document Analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically examines existing documents — such as policy records, reports, correspondence, and community archives — while actively involving community members or stakeholders as co-researchers in the selection, interpretation, and meaning-making processes. It merges the rigor of established document analysis techniques with the democratic ethos of participatory action research, ensuring that those most affected by the documents have voice in shaping what those documents mean.Critical document analysis is a qualitative method that systematically examines written, visual, or digital documents — such as policy texts, institutional reports, curriculum materials, and official records — through a critical theoretical lens. Rather than treating documents as neutral containers of information, it interrogates how documents produce, reflect, and reproduce power relations, ideologies, and social inequalities. The approach draws on critical theory traditions, including the work of Paulo Freire and Jurgen Habermas, as well as established frameworks for document analysis developed by Bowen and Prior.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Participatory Document analysis · Critical Document Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare