ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

参与式批判性话语分析×民族志×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (emerged as integrated approach)c. 1922 (Malinowski's Argonauts of the Western Pacific)
提出者Draws on Ruth Wodak, Norman Fairclough (CDA) and Kurt Lewin, Orlando Fals Borda (participatory action research)Bronisław Malinowski (modern ethnography); rooted in 19th-century anthropology
类型Qualitative research design and analysis approachQualitative fieldwork tradition
开创性文献Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761961543Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138504462
别名PCDA, participatory CDA, collaborative critical discourse analysis, action-oriented CDAEtnografi, participant observation, fieldwork, ethnographic research
相关65
摘要Participatory Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) integrates the ideology-exposing tools of Critical Discourse Analysis with the community-centred ethics of participatory action research. Researchers and community members jointly collect and analyse texts and talk to reveal how language constructs, legitimises, or contests unequal power relations — and then use those insights to drive concrete social change.Ethnography is a qualitative research tradition in which a researcher immerses themselves in a social group or community over an extended period — typically three to six months or longer — to study its culture, values, and behaviours in their natural setting. Originating in social and cultural anthropology, and consolidated as a rigorous method by Bronisław Malinowski in the early twentieth century, ethnography produces rich, contextualised accounts of how people live, work, and make meaning together.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Participatory Critical Discourse Analysis · Ethnography. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare