ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

参与式内容分析×焦点小组研究×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (formalized in community-based and health research contexts)1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s
提出者Developed at the intersection of participatory action research (Kurt Lewin, 1940s) and qualitative content analysis traditionsRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger
类型Qualitative research methodQualitative data collection method
开创性文献Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199811755Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
别名PCA, community-based content analysis, collaborative content analysis, participatory textual analysisfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması
相关56
摘要Participatory Content Analysis (PCA) is a qualitative method that integrates community members or stakeholders directly into the content analysis process. Rather than treating participants solely as data sources, PCA positions them as co-analysts who help develop coding categories, interpret textual data, and validate findings. This approach is widely used in health communication, education research, and community-based studies where insider knowledge and cultural context are essential to accurate interpretation.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Participatory Content Analysis · Focus Group. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare