方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 释义抄袭× | 概念剽窃× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究伦理 | 研究伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份 | 1980s | 1980s |
| 提出者 | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) |
| 类型 | Concept | Concept |
| 开创性文献≠ | Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗ | Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗ |
| 别名 | insufficient paraphrase, close paraphrase, lazy paraphrasing | conceptual plagiarism, idea theft, intellectual theft |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Paraphrasing plagiarism occurs when an author rewrites another's ideas in different words but does not cite the source. Unlike verbatim plagiarism (copying word-for-word), paraphrasing plagiarism involves changing vocabulary and sentence structure while retaining the original argument, logic, or conceptual content without attribution. It is harder to detect than direct copying but is still a clear violation of academic integrity. | Idea plagiarism, or conceptual plagiarism, occurs when an author takes another's ideas, arguments, theories, or conceptual frameworks and presents them as original work without crediting the source. Unlike verbatim or paraphrasing plagiarism (which involve copying language), idea plagiarism involves taking the intellectual content itself—the argument, theory, or framework—regardless of how it is worded. It is the hardest form of plagiarism to detect because it does not require word-for-word copying. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|