方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 面板数据粗化精确匹配× | 倾向得分匹配× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 研究统计学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012 (CEM); 2021 (panel extension) | 1983 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM, 2012); panel extension via Imai, Kim & Wang (2021) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| 类型≠ | Matching / quasi-experimental | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Panel CEM, CEM for panel data, coarsened exact matching with panel data | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Panel Data Coarsened Exact Matching applies the Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) algorithm to repeated-measures panel data, matching treated and control units within the same coarsened covariate strata across multiple time periods. It balances pre-treatment characteristics before estimating a causal treatment effect, combining the transparency of exact matching with the richer identification available in longitudinal datasets. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|