ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

序数测量不变性检验×序数确认因子分析 (序数 CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1984–20111984
提出者Roger Millsap; Bengt MuthénBengt O. Muthén
类型Multi-group model comparisonLatent variable / structural
开创性文献Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. DOI ↗
别名ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invarianceCFA for ordinal data, polychoric CFA, WLSMV CFA, categorical CFA
相关65
摘要Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous.Ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (Ordinal CFA) tests a pre-specified factor structure when the observed indicators are ordinal — typically Likert-type survey items. By using polychoric correlations and robust estimators such as WLSMV, it avoids the bias that arises from treating categorical responses as continuous.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ordinal Measurement Invariance · Ordinal CFA. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare