方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 序数测量不变性检验× | 序数确认因子分析 (序数 CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1984–2011 | 1984 |
| 提出者≠ | Roger Millsap; Bengt Muthén | Bengt O. Muthén |
| 类型≠ | Multi-group model comparison | Latent variable / structural |
| 开创性文献≠ | Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936 | Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | ordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invariance | CFA for ordinal data, polychoric CFA, WLSMV CFA, categorical CFA |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Ordinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous. | Ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (Ordinal CFA) tests a pre-specified factor structure when the observed indicators are ordinal — typically Likert-type survey items. By using polychoric correlations and robust estimators such as WLSMV, it avoids the bias that arises from treating categorical responses as continuous. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|