ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

序数判别效度×聚合效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1959 (concept); 2000s–2010s (ordinal adaptations)1959
提出者Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity concept); adapted for ordinal data by subsequent psychometriciansDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
类型Validity assessmentValidity evidence / construct validation
开创性文献Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名discriminant validity for ordinal data, polychoric discriminant validity, ordinal HTMT, ordinal AVE-based discriminant validityconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
相关64
摘要Ordinal discriminant validity assesses whether a latent construct measured by ordinal (Likert-type) items is empirically distinct from other constructs in the same instrument. It applies polychoric correlations and ordinal-appropriate factor loadings to standard discriminant validity criteria such as the Fornell-Larcker rule and the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT), ensuring that validity conclusions are not distorted by the non-continuous nature of ordered-response data.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Ordinal Discriminant Validity · Convergent Validity. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare