方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 在线理论抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (theoretical sampling); online adaptation ~2000s–2010s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Glaser & Strauss (theoretical sampling); adapted to online contexts by internet qualitative researchers | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名≠ | internet-based theoretical sampling, digital theoretical sampling, web-based theoretical sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Online theoretical sampling applies the logic of theoretical sampling — selecting participants or data sources based on emerging theory rather than predetermined criteria — within digital environments. Researchers iteratively recruit from online communities, forums, social media, or virtual networks, guided at each step by conceptual gaps identified during concurrent analysis. It is most commonly used in grounded theory studies conducted wholly or partially over the internet. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|