方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 在线研究日记× | 现场记录× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Late 1990s–2000s (digital adaptation of diary methods dating to early 20th century social research) | Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century) |
| 提出者≠ | Adapted from traditional diary methods; online variant emerged with widespread internet adoption (late 1990s–2000s) | Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al. |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative / mixed-methods data collection | Qualitative data collection and recording technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761941965 | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813 |
| 别名 | digital research diary, e-diary research, online reflective journal, web-based research diary | fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottings |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | The online research diary method is a data collection technique in which participants document their experiences, thoughts, or behaviours in structured or open-ended digital diary entries over a defined period. Delivered via email, web forms, blogging platforms, or dedicated apps, it captures temporally proximate, naturalistic data that retrospective interviews cannot provide. It is widely used in health research, education, psychology, and social sciences. | Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|