ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

在线文档收集×内容分析×
领域调查方法论质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (digital / web era)Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Adapted from traditional document analysis; digital form emerged with widespread internet adoptionKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative / mixed-methods data collection techniqueQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名digital document collection, web document gathering, online archival data collection, digital records collectionİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关55
摘要Online document collection is the systematic process of identifying, retrieving, and compiling digital documents — including web pages, institutional publications, social media posts, policy documents, and digital archives — as primary or supplementary research data. It extends classical document analysis into internet-mediated environments, enabling researchers to access large, geographically dispersed corpora without fieldwork travel or physical archive access.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Online Document Collection · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare