ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

鉴定标本数量×使用磨损分析×
领域考古学考古学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19711980
提出者R. E. ChaplinLawrence Keeley
类型Faunal quantification methodTool function inference
开创性文献Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗
别名NISP method, specimen countmicrowear, tool use analysis
相关44
摘要Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Number of Identified Specimens · Use-Wear Analysis. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare