方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 鉴定标本数量× | 使用磨损分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 考古学 | 考古学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1971 | 1980 |
| 提出者≠ | R. E. Chaplin | Lawrence Keeley |
| 类型≠ | Faunal quantification method | Tool function inference |
| 开创性文献≠ | Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗ | Keeley, L. H. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | NISP method, specimen count | microwear, tool use analysis |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages. | Use-wear analysis (also called microwear or tool-use analysis) is a method that infers the function of stone tools from microscopic wear patterns on their cutting edges and surfaces. Pioneered by Lawrence Keeley in the 1970s-1980s, this technique examines damage patterns, polishes, and edge rounding produced as tools contact different materials during use. By analyzing these wear patterns, archaeologists can determine whether a tool was used to cut plant material, meat, bone, hide, or wood—revealing detailed information about task specialization and subsistence practices in prehistoric societies. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|